Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
You should post this same post on Stack Exchange Physics Stack Exchange You'll get honest knowledgeable feedback there |
I am into advanced math (even if not up to read string theory stuff in
arXiv.org e-Print archive like it is gfy thread, but I do read
arXiv.org e-Print archive daily) and... your 50+ pages document misses the math formulas. This make it more difficult to verify or understand the whole thing. You state "I am admittedly over my head when it comes to providing mathematical proof of the Theory from this point". Probably everyone else at GFY too.
So I also suggest you post that in
Physics Stack Exchange and give us here the URL of the post so we can follow. Also, post here:
Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community and
http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/6-physics/ in the proper section, again give us the URL so we follow.
By the way, even with lots of math (correct one) it is difficult to understand stuff at times. For example Shinichi Mochizuki's Inter-universal Teichmüller theory (yes, I've read it, understood 1%):
http://www.nature.com/news/the-bigge...-proof-1.18509
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151...for-abc-proof/
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-math-mi...ure-proof.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/commen...of_series_of/?