Talk to a lawyer; This goes to 'Right of Publicity' and not copyright parody. While public figures, like politicians, do not have certain rights of publicity -- political cartoons, etc. -- private persons -- like Paris Hilton do have 'Right of Publicity'. This is not copyright law, it is common law. The following would apply in the US state of California, jurisdiction may be an issue.
Ninth Circuit Lets Right of Publicity/Parody Case Go to the Trier of Fact
Quote:
|
The test is then whether the product containing the celebrity's likeness is so transformed that it has become primarily the defendant's own expression rather than the celebrity's likeness. When the art of skill and talent is "manifestly subordinated to the overall goal of creating a conventional portrait of a celebrity so as to commercially exploit his or her fame, then the artist's right of free expression is outweighed by the right of publicity." Comedy Three Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal.4th 387, 407 (Cal. 2001).
|
Talk to a lawyer and find out just how this might apply and could these courts somehow get jurisdiction ...