Quote:
Originally Posted by FetishWeb
He was for the war. When it was popular to say so.
Now he's against the war. Now that it is popular to say so.
If he polled better saying he was for the war, he would still be "for the war". Most informed people don't trust oligarchs posing as capitalists that carry populist messages when they have historically demonstrated less judgement than people like Hunter S. Thompson.  |
He wasn't a politician in 2002 so he had no reasons to care about a poll. So that pretty much negates your foolish statement.
And if he wanted to go with polls to win the Republican nomination he wouldn't have said what he said about the war and Bush. It was a very UN-Republican thing to say.
You're blinded by your bias. And trying to look down your nose at other people THINKING you are somehow more "informed" (smarter) than other people...is a joke.