View Single Post
Old 03-05-2016, 02:02 PM  
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 64,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
dynamo...do you think it was "okay" to drop the atomic bombs on those cities? After all...we are told by history books that is shortened the war and saved thousands of American soldiers from being killed.

And if a country were to be at war with another country today, and dropped a nuclear weapon on a populated city to save the lives of their own soldiers...do you think it would be okay?

And if it was a World War that the U.S. had been involved in for 5 years and it happened today...would it be okay?
As long as it saved American soldiers lives would it be okay to kill families like Truman did?

Or would you say it's no longer okay because it's a different era or whatever?

I think it was a war crime then. And it would be a war crime now. The only reason it isn't a war crime in the history books is because the winners write history. And there was nobody on the planet who could make the U.S. a "war criminal".

Still isn't.

But might doesn't make right (or maybe it does?)
all i can say with total certainty is that I am against war. It's hard for me to try and put myself in the time of war and make a judgement call on those bombs. hindsight is certainly 20-20. I do know that the bombings of those Japanese cities prior to the atomic bombs killed a lot of people in very bad ways, that went on for years.

We've always thought War began with the advent of societies, we've recently learned war predates society, i.e., war is an intrinsic human trait.

Discovery Of Ancient Massacre Suggests War Predated Settlements : The Two-Way : NPR
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote