Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnetron
I'm not saying you or everyone who approves of Trump is misinformed, but he certainly appeals to an audience that believes anything posted by bloggers or forwarded in emails.
|
I don't think that trying to profile the supporters of candidates means much.
If we did that then we could say that Clinton appeals to an audience of uneducated people on welfare.
Doesn't mean anything.
The only thing that is important in my mind is what these candidates stand for.
Trump wants to build a wall. And he's not the first one to say that. Congress has tossed that idea around for the last few years.
I find that idea to be un-American. I thought we condemned the Soviet Union for doing the same thing in Berlin and that we all celebrated when the wall came down. And now we want to build one too???
I've said it a few times, the only "problem" we have with Mexico is caused by our Federal Govt. and it's prohibition on recreational drugs. Same thing happened with alcohol prohibition: violence, gang activity, and people getting filthy rich off of it.
Also...Trump is wanting to put even MORE money into the military. WTF? It's already bigger than the next 10 countries combined.
The only things I like about Trump are his economic ideas and his trade ideas. I think he's the master of those two things.
Now Hillary...I honestly don't know what the fuck she would do. She lies every other word out of her mouth. So I don't trust her at all with anything.
Anyway, that's just my opinion. I don't think that people picking certain segments of candidates supporters and trying to brand the candidate that way has anything to do with anything.
Just my opinion.