Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
The best way to reduce webcam recording by sleazeballs is to put the content behind pay walls. That will stop them 98% of the time. Paying for a 10 minute hardcore cam show costs upwards of $20 ... Except for the ''freemium'' cam site model -- I wont miss them when the models are no longer there with their [*DMCA*] overlays gone -- they just cut that part of the frame out and the site's watermark too then scale the result out.  |
Yes the DMCA overlay as well as "property of xxxxx" overlays are so much the sign of desperation as these are absolutely not useful.
I sure agree the issue is 100% the free public shows (freemium, for tips or whatever you call these), but after cam4, mfc, chaturbate and all these went popular (and sustainable for them), the guys simply moved there in big part, and models had to adapt or die. We still have chatgf.com which does not even give free chat (appointment only) and is doing ok; as well as in tubecamgirl.com got group shows requiring a ticket to be paid to enter. But it is less and less probable for most cam girls to be noticed and earn a living without show anything in any free room; even just topless which would be ok for the girls, if no one recorded and re-posted these in russian, colombian and filipino free sites, where neighbours, friends and relatives will see.
JesseQ: we been more model-centric than some other sites, but if the biggest cam sites are user centric (i.e. setup all in a way so that the home page is filled of most free shows as possible, what most guys want), then our effort of being model-centric (as well as the effort of some other smaller sites) got little effect for anyone. Except that a few models recognise it in forums - despite NOT being online with us anymore as yours
In fact we're so fond of models talking good of ours, BUT, really being online in other sites they talk bad of. That happens all the time.