Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
|
That's exactly what I would have expected since things like assisted suicide are not protected.
In the specific case of BDSM, why would the court think that someone can consent
to anything after being restrained?
There can be a complex argument about the role play involved in the case but that means reading the victims mind.
The less complex argument is that a person tied up is a person tied up, no matter what's in their mind.
Simply put, if he tied someone up and they didn't like it then he fucked up.
The court simply agreed to see things the same way the neighbors would.