Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua G
problem with you is, you talk like you know about topics that you dont actually know about. You dont know the limits of your knowledge & talk out of your ass.
There are several southern states in USA where its gun free-for-alls. no permit, concealed carry, places where parents teach their 4 years olds to shoot.
guess what? texas does not have every bar fight & road rage turn into a gun battle. same with AZ, MT, on & on.
you make arbitrary comments with zero facts to back them up. typical left wing crapola. like i said, bring a french bread to a gun fight & see how you do.
PS my level of thinking is 5x your fairy tale fantasy lib land that lives only in your mind.  |
The problem with Trump is he can get away with talking bullshit to an audience that can't see through it.
Like people who confuse the English language and mistake
Quote:
|
Plus every bar fight, pavement dispute or car rage incident would risk gun violence.
|
As meaning, they do end up as gun fights. Shows you live in a world where English is badly taught.
Yes, more properly trained armed security forces would help. But don't confuse that with arming dumbnuts because people in the 18th Century faced dangers that are no longer here. I believe it said, "well-armed militia" not dumbnuts who go to a gun show.
Quote:
Gun show loophole, gun law loophole, Brady law loophole (or Brady bill loophole), private sale loophole, or private sale exemption is a political term in the United States referring to sales of firearms by private sellers, including those done at gun shows, dubbed the "secondary market". The term refers to the viewpoint that there is an inadequacy in federal law, under which "[a]ny person may sell a firearm to an unlicensed resident of the State where he resides as long as he does not know or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms".
Under federal law, private-party sellers are not required, nor are they permitted to perform background checks on buyers. They also are not required to record the sale, or ask for identification. This requirement is in contrast to sales by gun stores and other Federal Firearms License (FFL) holders who are required to record all sales and perform background checks on almost all buyers, regardless of whether the venue is their business location or a gun show. Access to the NICS background check system is limited to FFL holders and FFL's are not issued to persons that only sell firearms at gun shows.
A late 20th century report by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) commissioned by then-president Bill Clinton stated that transactions and sales of firearms by private U.S. citizens contribute to illegal activities. Since the mid-1990s, gun control advocates have voiced concern over the perceived loophole in legislation, and campaigned to require background checks and record-keeping for all gun sales. Contrarily, gun rights advocates have stated the laws function as intended, and no loophole exists. They have contended that required background checks and record-keeping for private sales of firearms endanger Second Amendment rights, and exceed the government?s authority, regardless of the venue.
|