Quote:
Originally Posted by nico-t
How i look at it:
- Clinton is neck deep in the corrupt agenda of the last decades which has destroyed the economy and destroyed countries. Nothing will change here.
- Sanders will be too weak, he is under control of lobbyists, and he will budge to the Washington elite's agenda, that's almost a guarantee. So he will continue the corrupt agenda as well.
- Out of all of these candidates, and out of all of the candidates of the last decades, Trump is unique: Not controlled by big money because he has it. He has an own opinion and does not care about political correctness. If he will become president (which will never happen - the establishment will go to extremes to prevent that, not excluding an assasination attempt) he is the only one who might go against the existing agenda. The establishment are worried he cannot be controlled, hence the full blown propaganda assault on him by all meainstream media outlets - which should tell anyone enough to vote for him. The ones who have the control are finally worried and i love it.
|
I'm not sure I agree that Sanders would be controlled by lobbyists statement, he seems quite clear that he wants to end all that (even a small step forward would be a good thing) but I can't disagree with you that he may come off as weak with regards to other nations anyway.
Trump may not have all the lobbyists money pushing him around if elected but his ego could be far more dangerous if placed at the helm. He's not the type to listen to advisers or surround himself with the smartest people possible, even if he did he'd get rid of them as soon as they had a disagreement. The worst thing any leader can do is surround himself with yes men.
I honestly wish they would put an end to career politicians. There are better, smarter people who would do a much better job at it and it would save people a lot of time and money and wasted time frankly. Shit, it has become such a big deal you even have this canadian asshole chiming in on it.. haha