Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Paul Ryan on the other hand is probably the smartest of the entire bunch on the republican side. I think that Ryan is the GOP's best hope of winning the whitehouse, or at the very least, saving the republican party.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
I didn't say he was the best to win the whitehouse, and I didn't say anything about what the people want.
|
Mr. Prince, in order for the Republican candidate to win the whitehouse, he must be voted by the people. So you are saying that Paul Ryan is the best option for Republican nomination by the people... period. Now, as I read your words, you are playing the word game. You are saying GOP's best hope (eluding that democrats would easily win), and not sure your meaning behind saving the republican party. Republican party would be so shattered if a non candidate was elected nominee.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
I didn't say anything about what the people want. I didn't say anything about him becoming president. I said he would be the next republican nominee. Funny how you read things that aren't even there. And you have the fucking nerve to call me "low information". Funny how you like to insult people every time they prove you wrong, and funny (or sad) how you blame new and science sources for misinformation any time what's [resented doesn't fit your view of the world.
|
Mr. Prince, you did say what the people wanted because you said Paul Ryan would be best hope for whitehouse. How would he get there without the people's vote?
Robbie, I do believe you owe an apology to prince... just because.
