Quote:
Originally Posted by jerkules
Why they should rank sites that have no unique content (thin content with little or no added value). They all are going to be hit sooner or later. It is very fair.
|
I agree partially there. I think that sites with duplicate content should not be ranked for keywords related to the content that's duplicated.
But that's not the main issue here. If Google's aim is to display the most reliable and relevant results, then it's not doing its job.
These are visitors who are specifically looking for a site by using its brand name, rather than the URL. Some sort of direct traffic you could say. And what does Google do in this instance?
Completely wipe out the most relevant result for their search query.