Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken
Damn you are an idiot....
Firstly the argument that I called out was that half of the republicans will vote for Clinton.
That was a delusional argument, actually beyond the delusional.
Then he started saying that republican women will not vote for Trump. That is also completely wrong as you can see that 56% in CT, 47% in MD of women voted for Trump WHEN THERE WERE STILL CRUZ AND KASICH to choose from.
And yet somehow you imagine that Trump won't get at least those numbers from republican women when there will be no cruz and kasich for them to choose from?
I mean I am typing this and shaking my head that I have to explain things like that...  
On the other hand I am not surprised you do not grasp basic logic, it is you, Rochard, after all... |
Your post said:
"Oh, by the way, random number to you - Trump got 56% of Women vote in Connecticut as an example. Yet surely most of the republican women will not vote for him in general election"
I read as this "56% of the women in Connecticut voted for Bush, so you must be an idiot if you think Trump will not get women to vote for him".
What one demographic in the Republican party does in one (very small) state is not remotely connected to what will happen in the general election.