Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
If you read the WHOLE article; The "Federal policeman" was an armed security guard hired by Homeland Security.
He was suspended from duty and his government issued badge and gun taken from him when he became the subject of a restraining order. The handgun(s?) used by him in these assaults and killings were privately obtained.
It isn't even in the news anymore -- WTF?
|
That's pretty much my point.
All the gun control lobbyists and politicians all say that the Federal Govt. needs to decide who can and can't own guns.
And here they had an employee that they themselves thoroughly vetted and employed. According to their strict standards he would be a person perfectly suited to own a gun.
You know, I've said this before and I'll say it again...for the govt. to disarm or make it difficult for the citizens of this country to obtain a gun, they need to change the constitution.
The politicians don't have the balls to do that. So the "controversy" will continue...unless of course it's a govt. law enforcement person. Then it gets ignored.