Quote:
Originally Posted by Biddx
I agree but it would not be financially sustainable for tubes to offer High Quality VR that is being repeatedly watched for free.
Yes they can offer shit low res quality like what is currently on pornhub, but the high res VR is very bandwith intensive.
My feeling is the clips that pornhub are providing are teasers, if people do wan't to experience full lenght, high res VR content they will at some point have to pay for it.
This is the industries best chance of bringing back a culture of paying customers to some extent. This is not another 3D fail, VR will shape some form of the future of the adult industry.
|
VR porn isn't so great people
have to have it jerk off. I can jerk off to SD shot on an old camera. The major difference is belief. Can the model make me believe she would fuck me, not that I would fuck her? Which most think is enough.
Will BW be so great that it it isn't affordable to give it away? I remember similar being said in 2008. And look where that got us.
Slowly but surely selling intangible goods online is shrinking, making way for sites who offer it for free. Give
entertainment away for free and sell ad space off the sites.
The problem for most is they're unable to produce content good enough to keep an audience. Hence endless threads from webmasters telling
everyone how to get more traffic.
So instead of learning how to go down a spiralling Tube. Study the audience, think of what they would like to watch that can be publishesd n a mainstream site. Then produce it and the traffic will come if you do the fundemental webmastwering bit.