Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue
|
Man made pollution is contributing. For every one scientist who denies that there are 50 who say otherwise.
The debate should be moving on to, can we slow it down without going back to the Stone Age existence, can we prepare for it with science to produce more food and water to save more than 1 person in every 100,000?
The Third World is fucked. Even the Second World will find it tough. America won't be able to grow enough crops and find enough water to feed the 324,118,787 people it has.
Maybe a few of the youngest here will see the start. By 2500. The world will be a very different place. Simply because 7,432,663,275 are consuming the resources of a planet incapable of sustaining that number. When the climate change reaches its peak, the Earth may only be capable of sustaining a few million. Unless there are radical plans put into place.
And we don't have WW3.
So keep arguing about whether you should burn less gas or coal. It keeps the plabs away from the real debate.