Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton
i really have no idea where you take this from - so far nobody tried to take my identity away. but i know several EU projects that for example help cultural projects for minorities that otherwise would get no financing - the opposite of what you are saying.
but anyways - just like Trump supporters I figure that Brexit supporters are very articulate on social media and in public - in both cases i presume that the general population is not that unhappy with the status quo and the UK will remain in the EU and Clinton will be president.
|
So the EU takes with one hand and gives with another. While in between a lot goes missing. Saying these projects would never get financing, is the money charity?
Cameron is very articulate and keeps telling people who became poorer from being in the EU, the economies fine.
Telling young people it's their future and expecting them to vote for a worse one by staying in. That's the truth unless you can prove the average worker is better off by being in the EU. You can't because there's proof they're poorer while the rich are richer.
The general population in the UK is split 50/50. Austria came close to voting for a Right Wing President. UKIP are a joke but got 4 million votes. Right Wing parties are increasing in strength. Once a middle of the road party realises most Europeans don't want to be ruled from Brussels and only want a trade deal. The nails go banging into the EU coffin.
Why are you so keen that Germany should be ruled by Brussels? Unless you think the real rulers will be in Berlin. then you're delusional. Germany is there to fund the EU and supply jobs to non-Germans. For the benefit of employers.