View Single Post
Old 07-05-2016, 08:47 AM  
ilnjscb
Confirmed User
 
ilnjscb's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilnjscb View Post
It is "you're" my good man, and perhaps "you're" correct, but which felon are you referring to? At present there are none who are nominees for major parties.

The damage from this has been "baked in" as they say; only an actual criminal charge will derail her presidency. I suggest it will be as follows:

1. No charges, no reprimand for anyone +12 poll points for Clinton, electoral wipeout
2. No charges, reprimand for staff +8 points, wipeout
3. Reprimand, reprimand for staff +4 points, wipeout <-my bet
3. Reprimand, charges for staff +0 points, close race
4. Civil charges for Clinton, charges or reprimand for staff, -7 points, possible loss
5. Criminal charges for Clinton, unable to continue as nominee
There you go. "Mr. Comey said that ?no reasonable prosecutor? would bring a case against Mrs. Clinton for her handling of classified information on her private server. But he said Mrs. Clinton and her staff were ?extremely careless? in their use of email."
ilnjscb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote