Originally Posted by Rochard

In my example Peggy Sue assisted in the chain in counterfeit money being deposited in a bank. Again, her only intention was to do her job which required her to put that twenty dollar bill in the cash register. Her intention was never to assist counterfeiters in adding in counterfeit money to a bank.

Clinton's intention was never to break the law. Her intention was to do her job. You can argue she mishandled classified information, and you can argue she was sloppy with how it was handled, yet the end result was her server seems to have been more secure than the White House email system which was hacked. In fact, most likely some of this information was already compromised - Not by Hillary's server, but instead by the secure email servers in the White House.

I think at the end of the day, the State Department was very sloppy with how it handled emails. I also bet the problem is more widespread than we think; You know this is a problem in Congress too.

With violations into classified information.... It all boils down to intent and damage. There was no bad intention, and there was no damage done.