Quote:
Originally Posted by femdomdestiny
Most ridiculous thing is NATO talking about Russian attacking Crimea (yet there were no violence or destruction) when NATO introduced new rules of attacking countries back in 1999. Attacking without approval of UN council was the most dangerous thing to do (Serbia and occupation of Kosovo). But they did it, and showed way of thinking and what other people can expect in the future. I guess there was no one there at that time to stop them and they showed real face.
But what is done is done long ago. Even worse is that most of people accept that crap you are talking about. Population (it is irrelevant in what country they are) is stupid. People controlling medias knows that very well. Just repeat crap enough times and it will become truth. And that is very dangerous too, just like that in in first paragraph. Still, many are stupid to understand why.
|
Why do you keep repeating this non sense of no violence. It wasn't just Crimea. It's was Ukraine as well.
Russian armed rebels shot down a civilian airliner and shit loads of people on both sides died. Russia was most certainly the agressor and now NATO countries want more security aginst Russia for that very agression..
Oh but of course if we were to believe Putin it was just Russian soldiers on vacation in their tanks in another country.. totally legit.. blame NATO!