Quote:
Originally Posted by vano
woj, you got it all wrong.
It was ME who was allegedly using copyrighted content. Not MrSkin.
So if the lawsuit ever came forward it would be ME under fire, not MrSkin.
And the DMCA should have been directed at ME and not MrSkin (like i said, i doubt very much there ever was one).
They even got this covered in their terms, that in any possible event the affiliate takes all blame:
https://www.mrskincash.com/terms
Anyway, when I was sending them shitloads of traffic they didn't have any problems. They would say "please remove this" or "please remove that". They only got butthurt to the point of closing the account when I stopped sending them traffic and was getting rebills (which they didn't want to pay). |
Your jumping to conclusions.
The film company or whoever may have for all you know contacted MrSkin and stated they were not happy.
But as I say, if I was advising you, I would be saying that posting in a public forum that MrSkin are 'scumbags' and everything else you have stated they are (I presume they have your name and address on file too), is probably not a good idea.
Its one thing to ask us if we think you broke the rules or not, and if your account should be closed, but its another to post that the firm MrSkin is this and that.
As I say, I would think hard about your next posts.