Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
People would likely be angry with both. They would be mad at Hillary for what is in the emails and angry at Russia for hacking and getting them. If Hillary spins it correctly she could even pull a Trump and just say, "Look, Putin is a friend of Trump's, he probably hacked in, saw the emails, realized there is nothing there so they forged some to make me look bad. I don't know, but probably. Now bring me some KFC to pose with on my private jet so people will think I'm just a common person like them."
|
kane, nobody knows russia did the DNC hack. the liberal media is selling the story that obamas experts (
) determined russia did it. Why am i going to believe what obama says about anything right now? he's using the bully pulpit for campaigning! isnt trump bad enough on his own? is not the president sullying the office with his partisan attacks on trump?
talk about unfit for president!
the not-liberal media has speculations that the NSA mighta done it, since hilary & NSA are enemies. but you wont know that watching NBC news.
so if the shit hits the fan, what evidence will there be of russias involvement other than what NBC news tells you to think? so how can the public be mad at russia unless the media is lying about it when the media doesnt really know but wants to sell a narrative.
