Quote:
Originally Posted by vano
Yes, I am.
Here is just one of MrSkin's websites full of stolen, i mean "borrowed" content: Dakota Johnson Topless During Filming 'Fifty Shades Darker'
- they didn't pay for this content
- they didn't get permission to use that content
- they don't have a license to use this content
And they sure as hell aren't promoting anyone else but themselves.
Look, celebrity niche is tricky and hi-risk. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind here or set anyone straight. All i'm saying is that you can't trust MrSkin. Instead of working with together with you to solve things, they will jump at first opportunity to fuck you over and steal money from you.
I've learned the lesson and moved on elsewhere from their shitty, non-converting revshare program. |
That is not disagreeing with me at all. I made no assertion about Mr. Skin, other than that they told you where the complaint came from and they do give credit to their sources.
Mr. Skin can't work with you to solve you pissing off a copyright holder Mr. Skin has nothing to do with. You used content unrelated to Mr. Skin. They told you who the owner you have to satisfy is. Why would you give up domains and complain to GFY before contacting the owner of the photos to see what you could do to make it right?
If you can describe that the content is from Fifty Shades Darker, there is promotional credit.
Why are you scared to contact the actual owner of the work you posted and made money off of?