(also my apologies about the bad English, it's not my native language)
I've taken notes also and i have some nice ideas which might help us to get around their patent but since i still doubt that they can clam that each and every download of a video or song is covered by their patent this isn't a major issue yet. For now we should try to let the judges see that their claim is not reasonable at all and that they are just trying to scam us out of our hard earned dollars.
BUT your idea is not valid, before the interview i had the same idea but during the interview he claimed that they could go after any or all who manufacture, use, offer for sale and sell the technology. It was acacisux who decided to only charge the webmaster who was getting the recurring revenue be course that makes them the most money. Any moves we make to transfer the obligation to license the patent won't work be course they can choose who they charge.
I'm sorry that your 'great plan' doesn't work but you were doing what you're supposed to do, thinking about how we can get those gold diggers off our backs.
|