Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferus
- $18 yearly membership
- Watermark the videos with domain X (must be different from the cam brand domain)
- Make domain X the landingpage for your camsite with loads of short quality trailers
- Domain x should be something like "CamShowCaps" or "CamsShowDump" - The name should indicate(but not say) its communitydriven.
- Hope they steal the videos and post them on tubes, to drive traffic to domain X
IF everything fails, you still have raised the value of domain X
|
- Higher annual sub may be better.
- The vids will not be jacked easily MPEG-Dash EME.
- I would depend on SEO traffic -- the tube cam vids are very limited crap mostly.
- I would use a different domain and filter the traffic.
- As we own a registry a name is not an availability issue.
- I would limit network ad traffic to a branding and seeding operation.
I would actually like to pay a per view fee to the models posting the vids. Basically, the models' content will be producing that traffic -- linking that traffic to that model.cam web domain is a real possibility with a broadcast API and a billing wallet for the customer. And perhaps, an affiliate ($5?) CPA/PPS to the main (cam caps tube) site subscription sales -- so the price is $24.99 a year now
Still, an inexpensive price point.
Note: this is a 'working idea' for a new cam site and would not effect our current cam sites and their terms and agreements.
- One of the reasons for the declines people are citing in the various adult segments is the sales conversion declines. The ugly truth is most of the new users on the Internet are from developing nations and with less money to spend -- $25/year might be a major Internet purchase decision for many of these folks. Offering a reduced price service that is affordable to these people, if the service can be profitable, will increase market share and bottom line profits.
- I would also cap the monthly customer download bandwidth access to a reasonable value -- but webcam videos are not as costly like 1080p bandwith so that would not be a problem.
- I liked the low cost digital subscription price of that paper. Digital media like a ''newspaper'' has all the printing and distribution costs removed. If the big boys like the NYTimes and the WSJ were $50 annually for access to most content, namely: news and editorial, (limited as compared to a full subscription,) they would sell a lot of these subscriptions.
- 32% cite that the reason they don't buy is because of the price point -- the product is too expensive.
