Quote:
Originally posted by LeeNoga
Not. It should be defined as a commitment between 2 people.
Unions are fine but when your lover is in ICU and they forbid their sig other to see them but let in a sister who has not talked to them in 20 years sucks.
Most everything else we can do contractual for rights and benefits.
|
no wait we are in agreement.
i'm speaking on the simple definition of the word, not its legal implications.
gay people should get the tax breaks and shit like anyone else. i'm just saying if they are really so concerned about the sanctity of the word "marriage" they dont need to define it as such.