Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
Comparing the amount of people who attend political rallies versus the number of people in the general voting public is like comparing a handful of sand vs a beach. It's not a viable metric because only a small percentage of citizens will ever attend a rally.
Even if Trump is drawing massive crowds in blue states -- which he might be -- doesn't matter. Did Bernie Sander's MASSIVE crowds matter? Everyone I know is voting for Hillary Clinton. None of them have been to a rally. I know four people who have been to Trump rallies just because they wanted to see the sideshow -- not particulary because they support him. His rallies are combination of the local angry white people, confused dipshits and people who want to say they saw the trainwreck when it came to their town.
and you're a fucking idiot also.
|
your the fucking idiot.
rallies are the surest sign of GRASSROOTS ENERGY. there is no better sign for a candidate, than people that MAKE THE EFFORT to go to a rally, just like voters have to MAKE THE EFFORT to vote.
more people at rallies means more people will vote. NOBODY is excited for hilary. this alleged lead she has is total...liberal...bullshit.
this is where liberals are now, arguing that huge rallies dont mean anything. gotta wonder, if hilary had bigger rallies & more social media likes, would bronco sing the same tune? of course not.
he thinks fudged polls are more truthful than crowd sizes at rallies.
