Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
Let me show you some even more interesting calculations. As we know, HIV is not very virulent. A chance to get it during a straight sex act is about 0.5% (a half of a percent) and it's about 4% for anal.
What does it mean? it does mean that to infect 5 performers, there must be 1000 of vaginal sex or 125 anal sex scenes filmed where at least one person was infected.
Is it a lot or not? Actually this means that 0.6% of all 165K straight sex scenes that were filmed during 15 years (11K a year) were involving at least one HIV-infected performer. Now it doesn't sound good, right? And note that we have counted the documented cases only. Course the real number of infected performers is much more. I'm talking about all those performers who've got lost (left the industry) after 1-2 scenes, so nobody can check their HIV status and nobody knows if they were infected as performers or elsewhere a year before or a year after...
|
no not at all, it means that a boy went to brazil, got fucked by tyrannies, can back positive, did not test upon return and infected several models doing DOUBLE ANAL. I PERSONALLY spoke with some of the models and knew them from shooting them, and a model that did anal with the boy, did not get infected while a model that did double anal with with the boy later in the same day got infected! and that is exactly what happened! now do some more math because you are making stuff up to change the stats. because the states are doing double anal with an infected boy is 100% probability from what I see.