Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
I think it is very reflective of his offline energy. He could have gone up on that stage, reached down his pants and flung shit at the audience tonight and 35% of the people would still vote for him. His diehard supports are more excited about him than Hillary's, but you have to assume both will have their die hard's turn out on election day. What matters is what the independents think.
Allowing his diehard supporters to rush to a website and vote that he won while Hillary's may not do the same does not reflect accurately who really won the debate. The only way to know that is to ask people from all over the political spectrum that actually watched the debate who won.
|
I hear what you're saying but even those polls can't be trusted. I use to run a telemarketing room for a mortgage company. I personally created the very targeted call lists and script. I knew before going in what the results would be if my marketers were as good as I trained them to be. There's so many factors that can skew those polls starting with the call list itself. Or how about the pollster having bias and not correctly tallying?