Quote:
Originally Posted by Coup
Why is it that you're clearly denying reality? He is making many rock solid points and saying in very clear terms what he thinks needs to be done. "Not more than a sniff" is an absurd statement. come on. I know you're a partisan wonk but get it together.
|
It just seemed to me that when he was asked about what his policy was or what he would do in certain situations he talked a lot, but didn't really say much.
I'm not going to vote for either one of these assholes so I don't really care who won.
In the end, I think she had the better of it when it comes to policy. He had the better of it when it came to passion and, for lack of a better way of saying it, putting her to task on some things. So, to me, it was basically a draw.
The big question is this: "Did this debate do anything to convince any of the few remaining undecided voters to vote for him?" I don't think it did. After the debate, I was switching between football, CNN, and Fox. On both CNN and Fox they had panels of undecided voters who had watched the debate. As far as I saw, every woman they talked to said they didn't like his apology for what he had said and they weren't convinced by him. I don't think he did anything to win women voters over and that will cost him.
This election is over.