Quote:
Originally Posted by Coup
I'm just operating under the opinion that you're arguing in favor of Clinton, however indirectly or unpurposefully, by presenting these 2 listed assertions while providing little to no evidentiary information to back up these claims. It's not a strong argument until you can back them up with facts.
|
There aren't really many facts no matter where you sit on this debate. You either think Clinton will or will not start a war with Russia over the Middle East. Or, you think Trump will or will not start a war with Russia over the Middle East. Clinton has said some stuff that could cause some issues in the Middle East, but, unless I am mistaken, at this point all we have is the word of a ranking Russian officer saying Clinton will start a world war with Russia.
I can't prove she will start are war, nor can I prove she will avoid one. Likewise with Trump. I just think all the players involved will be smart enough to avoid a world war when the prize is the third world shithole that is Syria.
The only reason I speak more of Clinton than Trump is that I think she is going to win and she is going to President.