View Single Post
Old 10-16-2016, 12:01 AM  
CarlosTheGaucho
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Here's the thing. And this is why I don't think there will not be a war. Russia can't beat the United States in a conventional war. They simply do not have the military might to do so. This means if they were to start a war with us the only way they could really hope to win is with the use of nuclear weapons and Putin is not stupid. He knows if he launches a nuke, even if it is not directly at the US, he will be opening a Pandora's box that likely ends with everyone dying.

Clinton has spent pretty much every minute of her life since she and Bill left the White House working on being elected POTUS. She will be the first female POTUS. Do you think she is going to risk destroying her legacy by being known as the first female POTUS who also destroyed the world?

There is simply too little to gain and way too much to lose in a war with Russia. In the end, cooler heads will prevail.
Oh I doubt she would want to do a total war with Russia. Just merely pointing out a proven track record of disastrous foreign policy that, as a matter of fact, involved also Russia. And that will bring more, and more problems. And with such track record of lethal incompetence these problems may have disastrous and unprecedented consequences.

One thing is very much certain - it simply won't get any better with HRC when it comes to foreign relations.

Creating and fueling more mess, flooding Europe with migrants while supporting islamofascist "allies", trying to apply a "hard stance" towards Russia while being strategically inferior and always at least one step behind, funneling money towards the military complex and interfering where the other cronies have something to gain etc.
CarlosTheGaucho is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote