Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
Thta's pretty much it. He had his moment and is now struggling to be relevant. The stuff he's releasing on Hilary is no shocker really -- and not all that bad. There is zero evidence of "pay to play". Just because some rich asshole wants to meet Hilary Clinton for a large donation to her charity (which BTW helps lots of people around the world) doesn't mean that there's some nefarious thing going on. There is no proof there was some imagined quid pro quo. Not saying it couldn't have happened, but you can't use inference as definitive proof of wrongdoing.
|
yea, I'm sure the rich guy was just feeling generous and picked Hillary's charity because that was the one that best met his altruistic goals... clearly it had nothing at all to do with the fact that Hillary had some power and could influence US foreign policy in the direction that is not best for the US, but is for the benefit of the rich guy...
