Quote:
Originally Posted by beerptrol
Yep, they should have paid her the 6500 along with the dinner. Cheaper than getting lawyers and bad publicity involved
|
I suspect Casinos have reasons why it's not good policy to ever pay over what someone actually won, even though on paper it looks like a cheaper way to hush everything up. Technically they already bent their own policy by paying the $2.25 which breaks their "wins are void if the machine malfunctions" policy.
They likely factor in that If she took them to court they'd win anyway, she likely isn't in a position to sue them and from a publicity standpoint, any customer that see's the non payment of a non win as an issue, will forget soon enough and resume their gambling at that casino as normal.