Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Sure sure.
Clearly what happened wasn't Bush's fault. It was Obama's fault. Or Bill Clinton's fault.
Don't kid yourself here. Bush inherited a good economy, and eight years later we were stuck in two never ending wars and an economy that pure shit. Of course it's Bush's fault. It happened on his watch. No matter how you try to spin this it was Bush's fault. Period.
And now here you are to tell us how it is. Unemployment isn't going down? It's down to 4.6%. The only time during my life time it's been lower was 2000, 1999, and the year I was born 1968.
I can't wait to see how the economy does under Trump. Let's see where unemployment is a year from now.
|
Since you are one of the dumbest human beings to ever post on this forum, i'll try to simplify this for you.
The economy expands and contracts, regardless of who is in office.
In a global economy, economies expand and contract with other global economies.
A good economy is going to become a bad economy in 10-15 years regardless of who is in office. A bad economy is going to become a good economy, regardless of who is in office.
All you are doing is parroting the party line and you know nothing apparently of macro-economics.
It amazes me that an adult thinks the sitting President has some magical power over the economy.
Since Obama is in office, I suppose that using your logic, this being the slowest economic recovery since WWII is also his fault 100%.
The point which you quoted, yet are too dumb to fully grasp is that if one president is argued to be 100% responsible for economic ruin ... then the sitting President is equally responsible for an economy that has basically stalled for 8 years. The "bush's fault" arguemnt was played out long ago, hence Dems losing control of the House and Senate.