it's interesting, i was just actually reading a few articles about this on eweek. it seems that there is an attack on SCO because it's very possible that SCO violated the GPL, and actually copied some of the linux code for it's linux compatibility code. kindof an interesting turn. SCO is still being very secretive about stuff, and is requiring anyone that looks at the code to prove things to sign an NDA... basically meaning they can't talk about it if they've seen it anyways.
there's also an interview with Mister T (torvaldis), they ask him about all this, and basically (almost verbatim) says SCO is full of shit, their claims are bogus.
there are also claims about how SCO is going about thier actual lawsuits. they are attacking end users essentially, and not distributors. basically, the end-users aren't violating anything, the only people that would be actually violating the copyright are the people modifying it and distributing it (ie. red hat). but, they're not going after red hat
apparently as well microsoft has settled with them, not sure how that is, but basically microsoft is trying to make the GPL look bad, that's why they're in bed with them.
anyways, head over to eweek if you want some interesting reading on the situation.
and FreeBSD is not exempt, SCO already said that.
have you guys heard the prices on the SCO license tho? they've already had the audacity to release pricing, and haven't even proven anything. but, about $700 for single-cpu servers, and $1400 for dual-cpu. on something they won't even show proof they own