Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHungLo
I'll just drop this here for you osama bin laden.......
Getting circumcised will result in:
? Having to go through a very minor surgical procedure that carries with it small risks.
? Improved hygiene.
? Much lower risk of urinary tract infections.
? Much lower chance of acquiring HIV, the AIDS virus, heterosexually.
? Virtually complete elimination of the risk of invasive penile cancer.
? Slightly lower risk of prostate cancer.
? More favorable hygiene for the man?s sexual partner.
? Much lower risk of cervical cancer and Chlamydia (and thus infertility and other problems) in the female sexual partner.
? More favorable sexual function and experience, with no reduction in sensation during arousal or in the sensitivity of the flaccid penis.
? A penis that is regarded by most men and women as being more attractive.
|
Your list is mostly nonsense, and you don't explain why circumcising women is considered mutilation, but circumcising men isn't--but then I've never seen any pro-circumcision advocate explain their way around that, except for vague mumblings about religious traditions, etc. Also, circumcision is done on very young boys who obviously can't give their consent to what is a medically unnecessary, elective procedure--how is that ethically acceptable?