Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Are you going to discredit peer-reviewed studies? Is there a big conspiracy to shame uncircumcised men?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127372/

-The majority of men who are HIV positive have been infected through the penis

-There is conclusive epidemiological evidence to show that uncircumcised men are at a much greater risk of becoming infected with HIV than circumcised men

-The inner surface of the foreskin contains Langerhans' cells with HIV receptors; these cells are likely to be the primary point of viral entry into the penis of an uncircumcised man

-Male circumcision should be seriously considered as an additional means of preventing HIV in all countries with a high prevalence of infection

-The development of HIV receptor blockers, which could be applied to the penis or vagina before intercourse, might provide a new form of HIV prevention