Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth
Having worked at Launch Complex 39 at KSC for more than a few years I can tell you there was nothing fake about the lunar landings.
If you look at the site referenced most of the arguments that it was faked stem from the lack of knowledge of basic physics,,,,its well know the flag was a foil like substance made to look like it was blowing in the wind, which there is none...no stars...really are you that dumb? stars are magnified by the earths atmosphere plus the light gathering ability of cameras in the 60s wasnt exactly sensitive enough to capture the very dim light from stars..one light source huh apparently this moron doesnt know that from the lunar surface the earth is very large and it reflects light from the sun...theres 2 HUGE light sources...Imprints...hello gravity or lack thereof.
Everytime I read some moron who uses these args it makes me wonder what they actually did learn in science class this is all very basic very simple stuff....
SMFH
|
come on, you are really going to come back at us with basic physics? that hasn't been taught to people at capacity for decades now. clearly it isn't important! If it were we may even believe the facts of the matter or even understand why they are facts at all! Not to mention the logic involved ie if it was something we couldn't do wouldn't it make more sense not to push their luck by faking it fucking 5 more times?? not to mention the numerous fly by's we did first!
next you are going to tell me that nasa released over 1400 images taken from the moon itself!