Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseQuinn
dude, this is a new era. he wrote it, ergo it must be true 
just so I'm clear: setting aside you have no idea who the protesters did or did not vote for, those who voted for a third party candidate or spoiled their ballots shouldn't have a voice for the next 4 years?
if so, does the same apply to men and trans peeps who showed up as well, or is the double-x chromosome the decisive factor?
you're adorable when you're angry. your message would have been stronger if you'd included a 'shrill' though. aim higher next time =) |
I don't need to know who they individually did or did not vote for. COLLECTIVELY (since that is what a protest march is all about, isn't it? Solidarity?) not enough women voted for Hillary to push her over the top. That's all that matters.
And I will bet you dollars to donuts if you polled the female crowds protesting and asked them if they actually voted or not the majority did not vote (or, as you say, "voted for a third party candidate or spoiled their ballots") thereby ensuring a Trump victory.
Bottom line: if every woman who voted had voted for Hillary (or even 75%) Trump would not be Prez now. And I am not angry, I am disgusted and disappointed.
Protest all you want now honey. It may make you feel temporarily better but it won't get you jack shit. The time to "protest" was Nov. 8th, 2016.