Quote:
Originally Posted by woj
Why is this even debated/discussed/studied? of course illegal immigrants voted for Hillary... in some states there are zero safeguards to prevent it, so why wouldn't they? The only question is if it was 3M, 5M or 10M... but does that even matter?
the discussion should be what we could do put in some safeguards to prevent it in the future, and the answer to that problem however is pretty obvious... oddly enough though democrats seem to oppose ANY changes to tighten up the security of the election process, they call it "voter suppression", I wonder why?  |
Who are the cheaters on Trumps side?
You protray cheaters as only cheating for Hillary.
Cheaters for Hillary wouldn't waste a cheat on California where she was gonna win anyway, they would cheat where it would benefit her. Common sense
Oh, and as a voter in California this is how voting works:
1) goto your assigned voting precinct
2) the man at the desk asks your name and address
3) he opens the ledger, finds your name and marks you off as voting
4) goto the 2nd person behind the desk and get your assigned number
5) goto the electronic voting booth, input your assigned number, and vote!
A voting cheater would have to know:
1) The address of a registered voter
2) The voters precinct voting location
3) Know that the voter hadn't voted yet.
If even 1000 cheaters had tried, statistically many of them would have been caught and charged with voter fraud. Voting monitors from both parties are their specifically to catch cheaters.