Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli
So you are saying that the poll is too flawed due to its biased self-selection of respondents? In that case, Richman's study is irrelevant, since it is an erroneous conclusion that is based on a flawed and unuseable data set. So... ? If Richman is wrong and the study is wrong, then WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR VOTER FRAUD?
|
I wouldn't call the data set "unusable", just have to be more careful about performing statistical analysis on it and reaching conclusions based on the results...
but some conclusions can still be drawn from it, for example that 6% or whatever he found to illegally vote is likely the lower bound of the actual fraud... so at LEAST 6% of illlegals vote... as the biases could only reasonably be expected to exclude "criminals", legal voters would have little reason to opt out of the poll or to lie...