Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
ahhh now i got you "anarchist communism" is a form of communism what adapted the anarchic part - yes.
what i meant is that the word "free" and "market" do not really fit together because a market has no moral and that´s why the market should be ruled somehow.
we have seen in 2007/2008 where the financial secor went because it was not ruled.
even the rules obama gave them where not enough but better than nothing.
now trump kicks this rules and as you arleady see in the stockmarket the game already begins again. it is already completely overheated and this is dangerous.
look in example the amazon shares - sure it is a big company but the PER is actually 113 - that means the price for this share calculates actual profits extrapolated on the next 113 years. do you think that ordinary people who buy that share are informed what that means? financial markets are so highly complicated that they MUST be ruled - especially because their money source are ordinary people who can loose all they have.
to eliminate this already small protection is similar to the reintroduction of freebooting.
|
immorality is possible with regulations or without, because regulating ones are human beings too, in 2008 the mess was created mostly by government chronies, just search for the term jp morgan and that will give you differant perspecttive than clasical statist arguements.
on the otherhand, when real socialism was still alive, everything was pretty mutch regulated and we saw how political power was abused and how actually burocrats and politicians göne so far in terms of "immorality".
if we come back today's situation, anti trust laws and regulations everywhere, yet cartels are existed and these cartels are actually best friends of governments.
because nobody cares about ordinary people, these laws only there for 2 purpous and these are; to create afew big families for a sirten country and let them be for ever, the second is making everyone believe that these so called regulations really worked.
at least without any sort of gov interference, either big or small businesses would have chance to take place.
for instans: in my country there are 3 cell phone operaters and their resellers, however if there were free market system, we could 33 instead 3 and members would have better service (although prices are good enough even in today's terms).
i remember when statism was kicking here, internet was so expensive, when dial-ups were still alive, phones bills were pain in he ass for so many people, at least even though privatization caused a chrony, we had better service and better prices.
i could go on for this, but we should firstly consider human factor and law makers are humans too
