Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
BUT...that is from more of The New York Times and Washington Post and CNN's so-called "unidentified sources".
NOT any actual FBI source. Just the "big three" anti-Trump media outlets "reporting" what they "heard" from "unidentified sources" and "multiple officials".
|
I'm not taking a side on this conversation ...however I just wanted to remind you that I believe it was the Washington Post who had an unidentified source during Watergate that took out a president....
And people were having these exact same discussions for years...
Turned out to be the #2 guy at the FBI was the source
Just some history to think about
Newspaper editors don't typically allow the printing of a story based on unidentified sources...unless they are confident that the source can be defended at least 3 layers in...otherwise everyone and their brother would be filing charges against the newspaper
If there is so much un-truth being spouted as I see a lot of people claiming here...why have no suits been brought....you would think that someone like Trump who lived in courtrooms for years filing suits would jump on this....just doesn't pass the common sense test
