Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Oh, well if the FBI director and other Spy agencies said so then it must be true. heh-heh
Funny how Nunes came forward a week later and said he saw the documents with names UNMASKED in classified reports.
No, Steve...what the FBI and other spies said was that there had been no FISA warrant brought by the Obama Administration to put surveillance on Trump Tower.
There was a lot of very careful wording in their statements.
I guess you can say that Nunes is a liar. And Trump is lying. That's your prerogative. And oh yeah...James Rosen is lying.
Or you could say that the people who are PAID TO LIE (the intelliegence agency's) just might not be telling the whole truth of the matter.
If this blows out and Nunes and Rosen have their facts straight...there will be a lot of those spy's going to jail. Think about that for a second. If you were the guy who listened in on Trump and then unmasked his name and submitted a report that President Obama then changed the regulations to allow that RAW data to be distributed freely to every agency...well, I think you'd be scurrying to cover your ass too.
|
You are also misstating what Nunes said. He stated that he did not have any evidence to show that the Donald had been directly or indirectly surveilled and that all of the surveillance that he knows about was perfectly legal. He is concerned that names were unmasked that should not have been unmasked during a perfectly legal surveillance of others and he wants to investigate to learn who did the unmasking. There is zero proof or indication that the Donald or any of his team were directly or indirectly surveilled. There is proof that names were unmasked that maybe should not have been unmasked and that is the concern of Nunes.