Quote:
Originally Posted by TBFS
there is nothing wrong with the 'internal redirects' as you call it..
besides it can both be follow or no-follow even with the path /go. Dependse how he set it up. Using such a path is also for tracking and getting data....
and most important of all.. its also not against google guidelines.
if webmasters have issues with it, let them contact him about it, he's not tricking anyone.... (these links are no different from all those trade scripts with ?out....)
|
I am sorry but seems like you didn't read my full post. I attached THE PROOF that theporndude.com tricked AT LEAST one webmaster. And i asked about this specific question to just 2 partners of theporndude.com. Could you imagine how many of his partners still don't know it? And theporndude.com NEVER replied to it.
I answer you also about why these links are against the Google Guide Lines:
He is not using the Cloaking AFFILIATE links functionality to cloak just the AFFILIATE links but to render to Google an optimized version of his website! How? Considering as AFFILIATE links also the links that are not AFFILIATE, but that he wants hide to Google! Why? Because he can't shows to Google the huge amount of reciprocal links he has. Plus he thinks it is a clever idea to hide some link to website in other language, or to websites that he thinks could host malware.
SO THAT, IS HE TRICKING HIS PARTNERS? YES, I attached the proof in various comments in this discussion.
IS THEPORNDUDE.COM STRATEGY AGAIN GOOGLE GUIDE LINES? Yes he has lost all his traffic and is:
- showing to Googlebot a version and a different one to its visitors
- collecting too many articial links