crockett

I'm really trying to figure out what your dumb argument is here. Are you trying to help prove Syria was using chemical weapons? I'm assuming those canisters are what Syria uses to hold various chemical weapons. I'm assuming the top picture is a picture at some point from the past where they were dealing with chemical weapon disposal..

Next we see a guy standing next to the same containers that seem to be empty or at the very least secure and not leaking..

How does this help your argument? Do you realize "empty" containers means the weapons were likely used, showing us proof that yes Assad did have chemical weapons at this airport?

Did you think this one through? Congrats you just proved the case that Assad still had chemical weapons!


Also.. The chemicals wouldn't be in those containers just "floating" around in a gas state. It's pretty obvious those containers are built to hold "shells" or the chemical agent in a second container inside that one. ie the warhead tip that would have the chemical agent inside.. Notice those containers have "handles" on the tops, that's because what you are looking at is just a storage container. The warhead chemical container would be inside that, which is why the tops (lids) have handles.. They take the lid off, get the warehead out when ready to use..

Those were either all used and empty, which "more" is evidence Assad has been using chemical weapons or none of the containers were breached.. Regardless as long as they were not leaking or were empty, of course they would be perfectly safe to be around.. It's like standing next to a nuclear bomb.. 100% safe until it blows up...

Seriously are you dumb? Those containers are 100% proof that Assad was using chemical weapons and that "Russians" knew he was using them..