Originally Posted by crockett

I'm really trying to figure out what your dumb argument is here.. I'm assuming those canisters are what Syria uses to hold various chemical weapons. I'm assuming the top picture is a picture at some point from the past where they were dealing with chemical weapons..

Next we see a guy standing next to the same containers that seem to be empty..

How does this help your argument? Do you realize "empty" containers means the weapons were likely used, showing us prove that yes Assad did have chemical weapons at this airport?

Did you think this one through?


Also.. The chemicals wouldn't be in those containers just "floating" around in a gas state. It's pretty obvious those containers are built to hold "shells" or the chemical agent in a second container inside that one. ie the warhead tip that would have the chemical agent inside.. Notice those containers have "handles" on the tops, that's because what you are looking at is just a storage container. The warhead chemical container would be inside that.

Those were either all use and empty, which "more" is evidence Assad has been using chemical weapons or none of the containers were breached..