Originally Posted by Robbie

That's called preponderance of evidence Rochard.
Look that up. It is considered to be the weakest type of evidence in a court of law.

You are using the same exact line of reasoning that people used on Obama: his dad is Kenyan, his brother is Kenyan, he went to a Muslim school, his name sounds Muslim...you get the picture.

This is the kind of stuff that wouldn't go far in a court.
To me you sound no different than some little old lady who "just knows" Obama is a Muslim who wants to destroy the US because just look at all the many things that point to it...

It's a dumb argument no matter what your agenda is.