Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
That's called preponderance of evidence Rochard.
Look that up. It is considered to be the weakest type of evidence in a court of law.
You are using the same exact line of reasoning that people used on Obama: his dad is Kenyan, his brother is Kenyan, he went to a Muslim school, his name sounds Muslim...you get the picture.
This is the kind of stuff that wouldn't go far in a court.
To me you sound no different than some little old lady who "just knows" Obama is a Muslim who wants to destroy the US because just look at all the many things that point to it...
It's a dumb argument no matter what your agenda is.
|
Won't go too far in court? We know for a fact that Russia hacked the DNC and released confidential information. In fact, Richard Burr was on TV this morning discussing not only the DNC hack, but also how the Russians hacked the Republicans but failed to release anything from them. This is not circumstantial at this point.
The further we dig, the more connections we find. People have already resigned in disgrace, careers are being ended. This investigation is just starting, and the further we dig the more we find.
This is so much bigger than politics Robbie. Explain to me why the former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency is having secret discussions with Russia?