|
Why isn't female circumcision promoted alongside male circumcision?
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.
Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?
|